Thursday, September 10, 2009

CIS Week Three Assignment Two (or whatever)

For those of you not in My CIS class, this may seem like a pretty off the wall entry. In fact, it is an assignment.
Once you have created the blog, read the article titled Military Intelligence Goes Web 2.0. The article talks about how the intelligence community is adopting Web 2.0 tools. Using this brief paper as a guide and having written a position paper as part of a team, do you think it is a good idea for the Intelligence Community to adopt these tools? Post these thoughts to your blog (make sure it is at least 250 words).

Frankly, it scares the pants off of me. I am still of the opinion that these things are nice playthings and they keep teenagers off the streets (though it also encourages them to do things like Tweet while they drive). I can also see how they do a great job of creating interconnectedness. For spy, intelligence and law enforcement agencies that have had cooperation thrust upon them of late, they allow for a better sense of immediacy, and perhaps even seamlessness never believed possible. Great. The scenario of subscribing to the Islamofascist daily blog and receiving information and updates on Bin Ladin’s spring break panty raid antics seems beneficial, I suppose. Everybody knows they will be from last year’s spring break anyhow since he is buried in a cave somewhere in the Hindukush. From what I hear the intelligence community has the whole web wired and since I have included the word ‘TERRORIST’ in my entry, some poor schmuck down in the bowels of an office building in Arlington, VA is stuck reading this. If he gets as many of these as I get updates from our PBWorks site, I pity the poor feller.

There is a history of employing the best hackers after pardoning them. Using these things as a trap to find talent is a possibility, but what happens when the newly hired IT dork employed over at the State Department spills his password to the übersexy Russian agent? She edits everything and creates havoc the Kremlin could never have dreamed of before 2.0 came along. Granted, we can use this conversely to create disinformation, but then this becomes just one of many tools to do that, making this a major step how?

Further, these tools allow for anyone to instantly become an ‘expert’. Do we really want Poindexter editing 007’s intelligence data because after a night of binging on chicken vindaloo, Poindexter now feels he is an expert on the Indian/Pakistanian conflict? Come on, the Indians and the Pakistanis are not even experts on this; that is unless they have watched Gandhi. Further, given my long-windedness and penchant for being opinionated, do we really want me editing anything? In the new blogosphere, even I am an instant expert. Then again, I have seen Gandhi several times and love chicken vindaloo.

In short, I think it is a great toy. I think it may become a great tool. It seems much too informal and unsecure for something as important as intelligence. We could not even keep planes from hitting buildings before this was prevalent. I have a hard time seeing that this will firm up our ability to protect ourselves, but it would be nice to get those Bin Ladin panty raid pics.

4 comments:

  1. I definitely think it is a good idea for our intelligence agency to use these tools to our advantage like you suggested by spying on terrorists. I do feel that it would make the government vulnerable by using the Web 2.0 tools in some situations because other governments and terrorists can spy on us as we do to them. I love you scenario of the schmuck who gives his password to the sexy agent, maybe not exactly but that is what always happens in the movies!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sam, I always love the lightheartedness and humor that you bring to our assignments! I wish that I could look at the world the same way you do!

    I think that our group definitely agrees - it is scary to think that anyone with enough computer smarts can hack into our government's secrets. Web 2.0 is nice for distance collaboration, but how secure is it really?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Show Parent Post
    Hide Parent Post


    Author: Samuel Jolly
    Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009 8:25:48 PM CDT
    Subject: Sam jolly (Group5) blog

    http://jollyphoto.blogspot.com
    It is funny the entire example that you mentioned, but you are right in many of them! These types of systems make you definitely an “expert” which in a way is good and in another is not. It is a good thing when the right people is using it and is able to search for information in fast manner and is efficient enough to use it as it supposed to. In other hand, it is not good when the wrong people becomes an “expert” in using these systems and are able to use it against us. Also, liked the way you express these systems as a “toys” because sometimes these types of systems should be seem as “toys” not “tools”.

    Good thinking!

    ReplyDelete
  4. You definitely have the same perception of web 2.0 as a lot of people. I hate to use the term older, as I am included in that, but the under 25 crowd has known no other existence but all of these "toys". When I see 7 year olds with cell phones, it makes me realize that I better improve my use of technology, or i'm going to find myself quickly outpaced!

    The only other comment I have to reiterate though is that I feel like web 2.0 is just further expanding the online assets the government already uses. Maybe by using web 2.0 they'll force some people with some computer "smarts" to actually do a better job of protecting the information that we have, no matter how outdated it is...

    ReplyDelete